Big O and O8 starting hand rankings

Omaha hi-lo splits the pot: the best high hand and the best qualifying low (8-or-better) each take half, and the high hand scoops if nobody qualifies for low. That scoring flips the preflop rankings hard against high-only PLO - the cards that win regular Omaha and the cards that win Omaha hi-lo are not the same cards. Every one of O8's 16,432 4-card classes and Big O's 134,459 5-card classes, simulated under real hi-lo scoring.

The short answer

Two aces plus two connected low cards is the whole story. A-A-3-2 double-suited tops O8 at 72.7% equity vs one random hand; Big O's equivalent is a 120-way tied group led by hands like A-A-5-4-2 ds at 66.9-68.6%. Both are built the same way: the aces block a rival's nut low and can make the nut low themselves, the low cards give a real shot at scooping instead of chopping, and the suits back up both sides of the pot with a flush. A hand built for high-only Omaha does not transfer: PLO4's best hand, A-A-T-T double-suited, is a near coin flip once a low is in play - rank 798 of 16,432 in O8 at 59.2%.

Data downloads (CC BY 4.0, attribution: solveplo.app)

Hi-lo rankings are not hi-only rankings

The same four or five cards, scored two different ways, ranked in two different tables on this site.

HandSuitsBest inEquity thereRank in the other gameEquity there
A-A-T-TdsPLO4 (high-only), #171.5%O8, #798 of 16,43259.2%
A-A-3-2dsO8 (hi-lo), #172.7%PLO4, #108 of 16,43267.2%
A-A-T-9-9dsPLO5 (high-only), #165.1-65.6%Big O, #46,387 of 134,45951.7-51.7%
A-A-5-4-2dsBig O (hi-lo), #166.9-68.6%PLO5, #2,513 of 134,45961.1-61.2%

Same pattern at both hand sizes: the hi-lo #1 hand is still a strong high-only hand (it has two aces, which never hurts), but the high-only #1 hand - built around a second pair, not a low - collapses once a low is in play. A pair of tens or nines can never be part of an 8-or-better low, so it contributes nothing to half the pot.

Big O's top tier

At this trial count the simulation cannot separate the top 120 hand classes: all sit around 66.9-68.6% vs one random hand. Ranking them 1 to 120 would be noise dressed up as precision, so this page doesn't.

What the group has in common: 99% hold an ace with a 2 or a 3, every member is at least double-suited, and the non-ace cards cluster on 2, 3, 4, 5, K. A sample of the group, in simulation order:

A♠A♥5♠4♥2♦A♠A♥5♠3♥2♦A♠A♥4♦3♠2♥A♠A♥5♠4♦2♥A♠A♥4♠3♥2♦A♠A♥5♠4♥3♦A♠A♥5♦3♠2♥A♠A♥5♠4♦3♥A♠A♥5♦4♠2♥A♠A♥5♠3♦2♥A♠A♥K♠4♦2♥A♠A♥6♦3♠2♥A♠A♥K♠4♥2♦A♠A♥T♠3♥2♦A♠A♥Q♠3♥2♦A♠A♥K♠3♦2♥A♠A♥6♠4♥2♦A♠A♥6♠4♥3♦A♠A♥5♠3♥2♠A♠A♥5♦4♠3♥A♠A♥J♦3♠2♥A♠A♥6♦5♠2♥A♠A♥Q♠3♦2♥A♠A♥Q♦4♠3♥

Suit tags in the data: ds = double-suited, ss = single-suited, 3+2 = a three-flush and a two-flush at once (more premium than plain double-suited), 3-suit = three cards of one suit, mono = all five suited.

Big O: the top 1% in eight tiers

Each tier is one quantization bin of the underlying table: a group of classes the simulation ranks together. Tiers are real steps; order inside a tier is not.

TierEquity vs 1ClassesCum. % of handsExamples
166.9-68.6%1200.10%A♠A♥5♠4♥2♦A♠A♥5♠3♥2♦A♠A♥4♦3♠2♥
266.3-66.9%1340.20%A♠K♥K♦4♥2♦A♠A♥T♦3♠2♦A♠A♥6♠4♥2♠
365.8-66.3%1300.30%A♠A♥7♠3♥2♦A♠A♥7♦6♠3♥A♠K♠K♥4♦3♥
465.5-65.8%1300.40%A♠A♥7♠3♥2♠A♠A♥6♠2♥2♦A♠K♥K♦5♠3♥
565.1-65.4%1290.50%A♠A♥T♠6♥3♥A♠A♥T♠7♦2♥A♠A♥5♦3♣2♠
664.8-65.1%1290.60%A♠Q♠Q♥3♠2♥A♠Q♠Q♥4♦2♥A♠A♥T♦3♣2♠
764.6-64.8%1280.71%A♠A♥9♦4♠2♦A♠A♥K♠7♥4♦A♠A♥8♦4♦3♠
864.3-64.6%1280.81%A♠A♥T♠4♦2♣A♠A♥8♦5♦4♠A♠A♥7♠6♥3♠

The full ladder is in the Big O CSV download above; the same tie caveat applies inside every bin.

What the top X% looks like

The hand sitting at each percentile boundary, by combo-weighted share. O8 left, Big O right.

O8 (4-card)

TopHandSuitsEquity
1%A♥A♦8♠2♠ss66.5%
2%A♥Q♥Q♦2♠ss63.3%
5%A♥K♥8♠2♠ds58.8%
10%A♥J♥9♠5♠ds57.1%
15%A♥J♠T♥8♠ds55.8%
20%A♦5♠5♥2♠ss54.7%
30%J♥8♥5♠4♠ds52.1%
40%8♥6♠5♥3♠ds50.3%
50%K♠7♥5♠2♠3-suit48.9%
75%8♠7♦6♥3♠ss46.9%
90%K♥T♦9♥7♠ss44.1%

Big O (5-card)

TopHandSuitsEquity
1%A♠Q♠Q♥5♥3♦ds63.9-64.1%
2%A♠Q♥Q♦6♠2♥ds62.3-62.4%
5%A♠J♠8♥5♦2♥ds59.4-59.5%
10%A♠Q♥T♥6♦5♦ds57.5-57.5%
15%A♠J♥5♦4♣3♥ss56.0-56.1%
20%A♠9♠9♥8♦2♣ss55.0-55.0%
30%A♠9♠6♥4♦3♠3-suit52.8-52.8%
40%A♠9♥7♠7♦4♠3-suit50.8-50.8%
50%8♠8♥7♠5♠4♥3+249.4-49.4%
75%Q♠9♥8♠6♦3♠3-suit46.3-46.3%
90%K♠J♥T♠T♥6♦ds43.6-43.6%

A hand at the O8 top-10% line beats a random hand 57.1% of the time. The median hand in both games sits near 50/50 by construction - equity vs one random hand, not vs a real range.

O8: the top and bottom of 16,432 classes

Exact per-class equity, 100,000 trials each, sorted - not bucketed like the 5-card table above.

Best 20

#HandSuitsEquity
1A♠A♥3♥2♠ds72.7%
2A♠A♥4♥2♠ds72.5%
3A♠A♥4♥3♠ds72.3%
4A♠A♥5♥2♠ds72.2%
5A♠A♥5♥4♠ds72.1%
6A♠A♥5♥3♠ds72.1%
7A♠A♥6♥2♠ds71.4%
8A♠A♥6♥4♠ds71.4%
9A♠A♥6♥3♠ds71.3%
10A♠A♥6♥5♠ds71.1%
11A♠A♥3♠3♥ds70.7%
12A♠A♥7♥4♠ds70.6%
13A♠A♥7♥3♠ds70.6%
14A♠A♦3♥2♠ss70.5%
15A♠A♥2♠2♥ds70.5%
16A♠A♥7♥2♠ds70.5%
17A♥A♦4♥2♠ss70.3%
18A♠A♦4♥3♠ss70.3%
19A♠A♥7♥5♠ds70.2%
20A♥A♦4♥3♠ss70.2%

Worst 5

#HandSuitsEquity
164286♠6♥6♦6♣rainbow18.2%
164295♠5♥5♦5♣rainbow15.5%
164304♠4♥4♦4♣rainbow12.7%
164313♠3♥3♦3♣rainbow10.3%
164322♠2♥2♦2♣rainbow7.9%

The worst hands in O8 are quads: four of a kind uses all four hole cards on one rank, leaving nothing to build a low with and nothing left to make a flush. The full top 100 is in the CSV download above.

Suit patterns decide more in hi-lo than hi-only

The identical rank combination, walked through every suit arrangement it can be dealt in.

O8's best rank combination, double-suited, ranks #1 overall at 72.7%. The exact same four ranks, dealt rainbow, falls to #93 of 16,432 at 68.1% - suits alone move it past 92 other classes.

SuitsCardsRankEquity
dsA♠A♥3♥2♠#172.7%
ssA♠A♦3♥2♠#1470.5%
ssA♥A♦3♥2♠#2170.2%
3-suitA♠A♥3♠2♠#3369.7%
ssA♥A♦3♠2♠#3769.5%
rainbowA♦A♣3♥2♠#9368.1%

Same story one card bigger: Big O's top rank combination spans rank #1 down to #574 depending on suits, from 66.9-68.6% down to 65.1-65.4%. A made low is worthless as a tiebreaker once someone else has the identical low; the backup flush or straight is what turns a chop into a scoop, and that's a suits question, not a ranks question.

Rankings are not a preflop strategy

Equity against one random hand orders starting hands cleanly and answers a narrower question in hi-lo than in high-only PLO. These numbers say nothing about multiway pots, and multiway is where hi-lo actually gets played: with three or four players seeing a low card, a big pair with no low draw is fighting for half a shrinking pot, and a hand that only makes the low gets quartered the instant someone else holds the same 8-6. Use this page to calibrate which two hands is stronger, then run specific multiway spots through the PQL query engine - game='omaha8' or game='omaha85' runs real hi-lo scoring, seats and all - before deciding how to play one.

Methodology

Hands that differ only by suit relabeling play identically, so the deal space is grouped into suit-isomorphism classes: 16,432 classes for O8's 270,725 combos, 134,459 for Big O's 2,598,960. Every class was simulated against one random opponent hand, dealt to the river, scored under standard Omaha-8 hi-lo rules: best 5-card high takes half the pot, best qualifying (8-or-better) low takes the other half, high scoops if no low qualifies.

O8 ran 100,000 trials per class (standard error about 0.16 percentage points) and is stored as exact per-class equity, same format as the PLO4 table. Big O ran 20,000 trials per class (about 0.35pp) and is stored bucketed into 965 equity bins, same format as the PLO5/PLO6 tables - differences inside one bin are inside the noise, which is why this page reports tiers and ranges there instead of a single rank. Big O runs fewer trials than the sibling PLO5 page (200,000): the top-tier pattern (aces, wheel cards, double-suited-or-better) is unambiguous well before that precision, and the page never claims a single ordering inside a tier.

The hi-only vs hi-lo comparison table looks up the exact same canonical hole cards in both tables for a given hand size - a direct key match, not an approximation - using the already-shipped PLO4 (400,000 trials) and PLO5 (959 bins) tables. Dealt frequencies (aces, ace-plus-wheel-card) are exact combinatorics summed over every class's own combo count, not simulation.

Tables generated 2026-07-18 (O8) and 2026-07-18 (Big O) with a fixed seed. These are preflop equity rankings, not solver output - no public postflop hi-lo solver data exists for either game. Regenerate everything on this page with node scripts/study-guides/gen-big-o-rankings.mjs.

Cite this page SolvePLO, "Big O and O8 Starting Hand Rankings", solveplo.app/big-o-starting-hand-rankings, updated July 2026.

Questions

What is the best starting hand in Big O (5-card Omaha hi-lo)?
No single hand: at this trial count 120 classes are statistically tied at the top, all around 66.9-68.6% equity vs one random hand. 99% of them hold an ace with a 2 or 3 (a nut-low blocker), and every single one is at least double-suited. A-A-5-4-2 and A-A-5-3-2 are typical members. In O8 (4-card), the single best class is A-A-3-2 double-suited at 72.7%.
How does hi-lo (Omaha-8) scoring work?
The best five-card high hand wins half the pot. The best five-card hand of rank 8-or-better (no pair, straights and flushes ignored) wins the other half. If nobody qualifies for low, the best high hand scoops the whole pot. Every equity number on this page is computed under those exact rules, not high-only equity.
Is Big O the same as PLO5?
Same five-card deal, different scoring. Live "Big O" almost always means hi-lo (this page); "PLO5" on this site means the high-only version on the PLO5 rankings page. The two rankings disagree hard at the top: PLO5's best hand, A-A-T-9-9 ds, falls to rank 46,387 of 134,459 once a low is in play (51.7-51.7%, barely a favorite).
Why do pocket aces matter so much in Omaha hi-lo?
Aces do triple duty: they're the top pair for the high side, they block opponents from making the nut low (A-2 or A-3), and they can be half of your own nut low. No other card does all three. That's why the entire top tier of both O8 and Big O runs through AA, and why a big pair without an ace - even trip queens - falls out of the top tier fast.
How often are you dealt aces with a wheel card in Omaha hi-lo?
An ace with a 2 or 3 in your hand arrives 11.7% of the time in O8 and 17.6% in Big O (the extra card gives more chances to pair one in). Two aces alone: 2.57% in O8, 4.17% in Big O. Exact combinatorics from the full class table, not simulation.
Do the same four cards rank differently in PLO4 and O8?
Completely. A-A-T-T double-suited is PLO4's best hand (71.5% high-only) and drops to rank 798 of 16,432 in O8 (59.2%) - a second pair of tens does nothing for a low. A-A-3-2 double-suited, O8's best hand at 72.7%, is still a comfortable top-1% hand in high-only PLO4: rank 108 of 16,432 at 67.2%. Aces travel between formats; broadway pairs don't.
What suit pattern is best in Omaha hi-lo?
Double-suited or better, same as high-only PLO - but the effect is sharper. Walking one specific card combination through every suit arrangement (O8's top rank set) moves it from rank #1 double-suited down to rank #93 rainbow - a swing from 72.7% to 68.1% on the identical four ranks. Suits matter because a made low is worthless as a tiebreaker once someone else has the same low, and the backup flush is what turns a chop into a scoop.